Comments on: Gloriously Unfaithful

By: CK

CK — Sun, 27 Mar 2011 08:02:30 +0000

just cos expressing one’s desire to be interested in other person on a physical level only, doesnt make it any sicker !! procreation is a part of human nature and thats why those organs are there with us from birth till death. they dont grow and drop off after achieveing certain process.
Assuming that other person will be intrested just by dropping such irrelevant hints.. now that was a big folly…

i will term it simply as lack of preparation and presentation
not with it.. but not against it either.
its ok.
just like during school days, if a gal talks to u politely it used to mean she is so very much intrested and head over heels in love with you.. so dont u think this also goes on similar lines ?
Sex is exaggerated in India i think.

By: Ritesh

Ritesh — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:43:29 +0000

Rama, I have always appreciated your courage in facing such unhealthy situations, and your role in this entire episode is another feather in your cap.
I fail to understand the recent ongoing morality quotient in the corporate world, where flesh is always dominating……..anything else. The gentleman (very hard to use this word for that person, but this is a public diaspora) is SICK…….simply SICK.

By: Manish

Manish — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:22:50 +0000

Rama… for once, i fail to understand the basic premise.

Is it about being FAITHful – or is it about choices?

the two ladies had their choices, and exercised them with full knowledge of what they were doing.

if you are talking about perception – both carried a wrong perception of the other. so it should balance out.

SO? what is the discussion point… i think i missed it completely… or is it a trick question – aka – the engine stalling one ???

By: Rama

Rama — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:40:56 +0000

Hey Krunal,good to see your comment. Though I personally have known lots of men who dont think your way.

By: anil

anil — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:09:26 +0000

honesty is not always the best policy..should not have disclosed that u dont own a belt …

By: Krunal Chahwala

Krunal Chahwala — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:05:26 +0000

Its all about how a man balances his relationship with his friend(girl) and his wife. Atleast for ME, a man should be/ has to be loyal towards his woman(wife). A MAN can be a good manager or a successful businessman but to be a “One Woman’s Man” is what a MAN is all about !!!

By: Rama

Rama — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:30:10 +0000

Hi Boss, It could have ended intersting if I behaved:). I dont have any colour belt so leaving quietly was only option. Learning drinking etiquette from you will be fun though..

By: Rama

Rama — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:28:28 +0000

Hi Abhishek,precisely thats what I wanted not to communicate:).Drinking with someone does not necessarily mean Invitation,though now I am very choosy about picking an invite’

By: anil

anil — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:47:41 +0000

How many of the 35 “eye brow raisers” were males? …that itself is a partly submission..Your friend has a valid query but which should not have a much surprising answer, since such experiences would be quite an often thing.
It would be unwise to quote polygamy / polyandry as a stigma today. Isnt this an age of ‘Ageless Body’..There’s no surprise why the participants opined for it.
Your business card should perhaps carry some extra details…something like your green belt qualification?, …the drinks and conversation should have ended in a more interesting manner
As of now, the savvy readers are also logged on to some drinking etiquettes

By: Abhishek

Abhishek — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:08:37 +0000

I am equally stunned at the audacity of people in disrespecting the relationship they have but I guess that’s the way it is. All these thousands of years of curbs and religious teachings of having a monogamy have not been able to change “genetic unfaithfulness” of humankind.

But I have learned one thing today, think before going for a drink with some corporate honcho especially if that honcho is a lady